Abstract
Bicycle infrastructure preferences vary by user experience and comfort, but evidence suggests both cyclists and drivers perceive separated bike lanes as safer than shared lane markings (sharrows). Little is known about sharrows impact in real-world settings, as no observational studies have evaluated their before and after installation impact. Santa Ana, California, incorporated sharrows into its active transportation plan to increase and encourage safe riding in a downtown commercial corridor where separated bike lanes were not feasible. Researchers conducted a natural experiment using a pre-post study design, collecting baseline data in 2015 before installation, and follow-up data in 2016 and 2017. A total of 54 hours of direct bicycle observation was conducted across two target areas over three years (2015 – 2017). A modest increase in bicycling was observed from 2015 to 2016, but was not sustained into 2017. Sidewalk and wrong-way riding increased slightly over time, while participation by female riders and older adults (65+) declined post-intervention. Sharrows offer a low-cost, scalable approach for promoting road sharing and guiding cyclists toward safer positioning, particularly in resource-constrained urban areas. This study’s real-world evaluation underscores the importance of tailoring active transportation infrastructure to meet safety and accessibility needs for all. Findings suggest sharrows are effective when paired with complementary strategies, such as targeted education, driver awareness efforts, or enhanced infrastructure, to better serve diverse populations and promote long-term engagement in bicycling. Further research can build on these insights by integrating user-centered evaluation methods and emerging data technologies.
References
Bourke, E., Rawstorn, J., Maddison, R., & Blakely, T. (2024). The effects of physical inactivity on other risk factors for chronic disease: A systematic review of reviews. Prev Med Rep, 46, 102866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102866
Buehler, R., & Dill, J. (2015). Bikeway Networks: A Review of Effects on Cycling. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 9-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1069908
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). Active People, Healthy Nation: Transportation. https://www.cdc.gov/active-people-healthy-nation/php/tools/transportation.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Adult Obesity Prevalence Maps. Retrieved July 17, 2025 from https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html
De Nazelle, A., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Antó, J. M., Brauer, M., Briggs, D., Braun-Fahrlander, C., Cavill, N., Cooper, A. R., Desqueyroux, H., & Fruin, S. (2011). Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. Environ Int, 37(4), 766-777.
Design., H. P. b. (2023). Communities in Action: Santa Ana, CA. Retrieved October 8, 2025 from https://healthyplacesbydesign.org/communities-in-action-santa-ana-ca/
Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: if you build them, commuters will use them. Transportation Research Record, 1828(1), 116-123.
Ferenchak, N. N., & Marshall, W. (2016). The relative (in) effectiveness of bicycle sharrows on ridership and safety outcomes.
Ferenchak, N. N., & Marshall, W. E. (2019). Advancing healthy cities through safer cycling: An examination of shared lane markings. International journal of transportation science and technology, 8(2), 136-145.
Fitch-Polse, D., & Agarwal, S. (2025). The benefits of active transportation interventions: A review of the evidence. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 18(1), 77-122.
Fortin, K. (2017). Santa Ana Active Streets is building an equity-centered, resident-led transportation coalition. Retrieved July 16, 2025 from https://cal.streetsblog.org/2017/10/20/santa-ana-active-streets-is-building-an-equity-centered-resident-led-transportation-coalition/
Gheorghe, C., & Soica, A. (2025). Revolutionizing Urban Mobility: A Systematic Review of AI, IoT, and Predictive Analytics in Adaptive Traffic Control Systems for Road Networks. Electronics (2079-9292), 14(4).
Goddard, T. B. (2017). Drivers' Attitudes and Behaviors Toward Bicyclists: Intermodal Interactions and Implications for Road Safety Portland State University].
Google. (2015). Map depicting target areas (numbers in yellow circles) and direction of observation. Google Maps. Retrieved 2015, from https://www.google.com/maps
Hess, G., & Peterson, M. N. (2015). “Bicycles may use full lane” signage communicates US roadway rules and increases perception of safety. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0136973.
Hoyer-Kruse, J., Schmidt, E. B., Hansen, A. F., & Pedersen, M. R. L. (2024). The interplay between social environment and opportunities for physical activity within the built environment: a scoping review. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 2361. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19733-x
Latino Health Access. (2018). Community engagement and advocacy programs: Wellness Corridor. Retrieved July 16, 2025 from https://www.latinohealthaccess.org/wellness-corridor/
Lawson, A. R., Pakrashi, V., Ghosh, B., & Szeto, W. (2012). Analysis of the perception of safety among cyclists. European Transport Conference 2012 Association for European Transport (AET) Transportation Research Board,
Levine, D. M., Stephan, D. F., & Szabat, K. A. (2016). Statistics for managers using Microsoft Excel. Pearson.
Marquet, O., Hipp, J. A., Alberico, C., Huang, J.-H., Fry, D., Mazak, E., Lovasi, G. S., & Floyd, M. F. (2019). Use of SOPARC to assess physical activity in parks: do race/ethnicity, contextual conditions, and settings of the target area, affect reliability? BMC Public Health, 19(1), 1730.
Mertens, L., Van Dyck, D., Deforche, B., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Brondeel, R., & Van Cauwenberg, J. (2019). Individual, social, and physical environmental factors related to changes in walking and cycling for transport among older adults: A longitudinal study. Health Place, 55, 120-127.
Monsere, C. M., McNeil, N., & Dill, J. (2012). Multiuser perspectives on separated, on-street bicycle infrastructure. Transportation Research Record, 2314(1), 22-30.
Noland, R. B., Laham, M. L., & Wang, S. (2023). Understanding preferences for bicycling and bicycle infrastructure. International journal of sustainable transportation, 17(9), 1020-1031.
Orange County Health Care Agency. (2024). Orange County Healthier Together. Retrieved October 8, 2025 from https://www.ochealthiertogether.org/
Sanders, R. L. (2015). Perceived traffic risk for cyclists: The impact of near miss and collision experiences. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 75, 26-34.
Santa Ana Active Streets Coalition. (2024). Santa Ana Active Streets. Retrieved July 17, 2025 from https://saascoalition.org/
Schneider, M. (2013). Why do sharrows work better in Long Beach, and do we need to rethink them? Retrieved October 8, 2025 from https://la.streetsblog.org/2013/09/05/why-do-sharrows-work-better-in-long-beach-and-do-we-need-to-rethink-them
Speck, J. (2018). Do Not Use Sharrows as Cycling Facilities: Speedy driving lanes with sharrow markings are not safe. In Walkable City Rules: 101 Steps to Making Better Places (pp. 146-147). Springer.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2024). QuickFacts: Santa Ana city, California. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/santaanacitycalifornia
University of California, L. A. (n.d.). Bicycle Count Data Clearinghouse [Archived December 20, 2019]. Retrieved July 14, 2025 from https://web.archive.org/web/20191220224230/https://bikecounts.luskin.ucla.edu/
University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. (2024). County Health Rankings & Roadmaps. Retrieved July 17, 2025 from https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/
Vasilev, M., Pitera, K., & Jonsson, T. (2017). Evaluation of bicycle sharrows within the Norwegian context. Transportation research procedia, 27, 1097-1104.
Wegman, F., Zhang, F., & Dijkstra, A. (2012). How to make more cycling good for road safety? [Review]. Accid Anal Prev, 44(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.010
Winters, M., Babul, S., Becker, H., Brubacher, J. R., Chipman, M., Cripton, P., Cusimano, M. D., Friedman, S. M., Harris, M. A., & Hunte, G. (2012). Safe cycling: how do risk perceptions compare with observed risk? Canadian Journal of Public Health, 103(Suppl 3), S42-S47.
World Health Organization. (2022). Global status report on physical activity 2022. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240059153
World Health Organization. (2025). Promoting walking, cycling and other fomrs of active mobilities. https://www.who.int/activities/promoting-walking-and-cycling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Mojgan Sami, Soultana Macridis, Deepak Sharma, Oladele Ogunseitan