Keywords
e-scooter
micromobility
active living
physical activity
How to Cite
Abstract
Electric scooters have emerged with the promise to shift citizens away from cars and thus are promoted by some as sustainable modes of transport that are sometimes equated to active travel modes. Yet, calling them "active modes" might be misleading, as riders often assume a sedentary position, contributing to less active lifestyles. In densely populated cities, e-scooters may not be the silver bullet for enhancing active commuting, as their sheer convenience sometimes nudges people away from walking. Furthermore, the aggressive riding associated with them can generate fears of injury among active travelers and consequently deter walking. Despite this, e-scooters' swiftness and convenience continue to attract users, contributing to riders’ travel satisfaction and wellbeing. All in all, e-scooters present a fascinating paradox – a mode of transport that's both sedentary and thrilling. Understanding this dichotomy is essential as we navigate the intricate intersection of mobility, well-being, and community health.
References
Bretones, A., & Marquet, O. (2023). Riding to health: Investigating the relationship between micromobility use and objective physical activity in Barcelona adults. Journal of Transport & Health, 29, 101588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2023.101588
Cubells, J., Miralles-Guasch, C., & Marquet, O. (2023). Gendered travel behaviour in micromobility? Travel speed and route choice through the lens of intersecting identities. Journal of Transport Geography, 106, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103502
Feng, Y., Zhong, D., Sun, P., Zheng, W., Cao, Q., Luo, X., & Lu, Z. (2021). Micromobility in Smart Cities: A Closer Look at Shared Dockless E-Scooters via Big Social Data. IEEE International Conference on Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC42927.2021.9500821
Gibson, H., Curl, A., & Thompson, L. (2022). Blurred boundaries: E-scooter riders’ and pedestrians’ experiences of sharing space. Mobilities, 17(1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1967097
Grant-Muller, S., Yang, Y., Panter, J., & Woodcock, J. (2023). Does the Use of E-Scooters Bring Well-Being Outcomes for the User?: A Study Based on UK Shared E-Scooter Trials. Active Travel Studies, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.1298
IERMB. (2021). EMEF-2021_Informe-Resum-Executiu.pdf. https://iermb.uab.cat/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/EMEF-2021_Informe-Resum-Executiu.pdf
Laa, B., & Leth, U. (2020). Survey of E-scooter users in Vienna: Who they are and how they ride. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102874
Milakis, D., Gedhardt, L., Ehebrecht, D., & Lenz, B. (2020). Is micro-mobility sustainable? An overview of implications for accessibility, air pollution, safety, physical activity and subjective wellbeing. Handbook of Sustainable Transport, 180-189. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789900477.00030
Mladenović, M., Dibaj, S., & Lopatnikov, D. (2022). Evaluation of electric scooter deployment in the City of Helsinki: A perspective on sociotechnical transitions dynamics and adaptive governance. Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi:443/handle/123456789/117810
OECD. (2023). Step Up! Tackling the Burden of Insufficient Physical Activity in Europe. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/step-up-tackling-the-burden-of-insufficient-physical-activity-in-europe_500a9601-en
Roig-Costa, O., Gómez-Varo, I., Cubells, J., & Marquet, O. (2021). La movilidad post pandemia: Perfiles y usos de la micromovilidad en Barcelona. Revista Transporte y Territorio, 25(25), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.34096/rtt.i25.10958
Sanders, R. L., da Silva Brum-Bastos, V., & Nelson, T. A. (2022). Insights from a pilot investigating the impacts of shared E-scooter use on physical activity using a single-case design methodology. Journal of Transport & Health, 25, 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JTH.2022.101379
Singleton, P. A. (2019). Walking (and cycling) to well-being: Modal and other determinants of subjective well-being during the commute. Travel Behaviour and Society, 16, 249-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.02.005
Spinney, J. (2008). Cycling between the traffic: Mobility, identity and space. Urban Design Journal, 108, Article 108. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/343378/
Tuncer, S., Laurier, E., Brown, B., & Licoppe, C. (2020). Notes on the practices and appearances of e-scooter users in public space. JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102702
Weschke, J., Oostendorp, R., & Hardinghaus, M. (2022). Mode shift, motivational reasons, and impact on emissions of shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 112, 103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103468
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jerònia Cubells, Alexandra Bretones, Oriol Roig-Costa